11/21/2023 0 Comments Kjv original manuscriptsThey relied on Beza’s work but not exclusively, nor did they always agree with it. Beza was the successor of John Calvin as the leader of the influential Reformed community in Geneva.īy the time the King James translators got to work on their new Bible version, the Textus Receptus had gone through over a dozen extensive edits and corrections. This was followed by French theologian Theodore Beza (1519-1605) who updated the work nine times between 15. Tyndale’s English Bible (1526) and Luther’s German New Testament (1522) relied on earlier editions of Erasmus’ work.įrench scholar Robert Estienne, known as Stephanus (1503-1559), edited Erasmus’ work four times, the last in 1551. No less than four times he edited his own work, in 1519, 1522, 1527, and 1535. ![]() He used 12 th and 13 th century Greek manuscripts of the New Testament that were housed in various Catholic locations, such as a Franciscan monastery in Cambridge, England, and a library in Basel, Switzerland, plus some manuscripts since lost.Įrasmus himself noted that there were errors in his translation. In 1516, Dutch scholar Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466-1536) published the first complete Greek New Testament, Novem Instrumentum omne, a century later dubbed the Textus Receptus, working mainly from Byzantine manuscripts. Which brings us to the next important issue. Because we have thousands of pieces of evidence for the Gospels, scholars are able to build a credible argument for why the Gospel of Matthew found in Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis is more accurate than the one found in Codex Petropolitanus Purpureus. Fortunately these aren’t the only two New Testament Greek manuscripts available to us today. This involves an incredible amount of detailed debate. But which manuscript is more trustworthy, and how do we decide which is correct when the two disagree? ![]() If all we had were these two early manuscripts, we could compare them to each other and attempt to discern what the original Gospel of Matthew, for example, said. It is currently kept at Cambridge University. Its 406 surviving leaves (of an estimated 534) contain most of the Gospels, Acts, and a small bit of 3 John. The 231 extant leaves are currently kept in nine libraries around the world including Russia, Greece, Vienna, and the Vatican.Ĭodex Bezae Cantabrigiensis is a 5 th-century manuscript originating from either France or Southern Italy that has one column in Greek with another side-by-side in Latin. Believed to have originated in Constantinople, the manuscript was possibly damaged by European crusaders in the 12 th century. What remain are 231 parchment folios (leaves or pages) of what was estimated to be 463 leaves, written in two columns each with 16 lines and only 12 letters in each line. ![]() Codex Petropolitanus Purpureus is a 5 th-century Greek manuscript that has portions of the four Gospels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |